Max and Amy had been the hosts of a preferred morning present on WHO Radio, a Des Moines, Iowa-based station, for a few years. Their program blended information, interviews, and discussions with a deal with native points and neighborhood engagement. Nevertheless, the duo’s tenure on WHO Radio finally got here to an finish. Amy left the station in 2007, whereas Max continued to host the morning present till his departure in 2021.
Their mixed decades-long presence on the station considerably impacted the native media panorama. The morning present supplied a platform for neighborhood voices and supplied in-depth protection of essential native occasions, contributing to the station’s sturdy reference to its listeners. Understanding the shifts in on-air personalities is crucial to greedy the evolution of a station’s programming and its relationship with its viewers. Modifications in internet hosting duties typically replicate broader modifications in media technique, listener demographics, and the general media consumption atmosphere.
This text will additional look at the circumstances surrounding their departures, exploring the person profession paths of each personalities after leaving WHO Radio and the next evolution of the station’s programming lineup.
1. Amy’s departure
Amy’s 2007 departure from WHO Radio represents a pivotal second in understanding the broader modifications to the station’s programming and its affect on the native media panorama. Whereas the “Max and Amy” present continued with Max on the helm, this occasion marked the start of a transition interval for the station and its listeners. Analyzing the particular causes for her departure and the speedy penalties supplies worthwhile context for the eventual finish of the long-running program.
-
Affect on the Present’s Dynamic
The speedy affect centered on the shift in on-air dynamic. Whereas Max continued to host, the established rapport and interaction between the 2 personalities had been inevitably altered. This doubtless influenced listener engagement and doubtlessly contributed to subsequent programming selections. Examples embrace listener call-in segments expressing their views on the change and changes to on-air options to accommodate a solo host format.
-
Causes for Departure
Understanding the explanations behind Amy’s exit is essential. Whereas particular particulars is probably not publicly accessible, widespread elements influencing on-air expertise departures embrace profession development alternatives, contract negotiations, and private selections. Every of those prospects holds completely different implications for understanding the broader context of the scenario.
-
Station’s Response and Programming Changes
WHO Radio’s response to Amy’s departure reveals insights into the station’s general technique. Did they search a direct alternative to recreate the unique present’s format? Did they shift the present’s focus? Analyzing these selections sheds mild on the station’s priorities and its relationship with its viewers.
-
Listener Response and Suggestions
Listener response performs a significant position in understanding the affect of on-air persona modifications. Inspecting viewers suggestions via call-in segments, social media engagement, and rankings knowledge provides insights into public notion of the change and its impact on the station’s reference to its listeners.
By analyzing these sides of Amy’s departure, a extra complete understanding of the eventual dissolution of the “Max and Amy” present and its general significance inside the context of WHO Radio’s historical past emerges. This occasion serves as a key marker within the station’s evolution and supplies worthwhile insights into the dynamics of native media landscapes.
2. Max’s departure
Max’s 2021 departure represents the ultimate chapter within the long-running “Max and Amy” story on WHO Radio, despite the fact that Amy had departed years earlier. This occasion essentially altered the station’s morning programming panorama and holds vital weight in understanding the general modifications at WHO Radio. Whereas Amy’s exit marked a transition, Max’s departure signified a definitive finish to an period. This occasion necessitates an examination of trigger and impact, exploring the circumstances surrounding his exit and its repercussions on the station’s id and listener base.
A number of elements might have contributed to Max’s departure, together with retirement, new profession alternatives, or modifications in station administration and programming route. Every chance carries distinct implications. Retirement suggests a pure conclusion to a protracted and profitable tenure. A brand new profession alternative would possibly point out broader shifts within the media trade, whereas modifications in station administration might replicate evolving possession priorities or viewers concentrating on methods. Inspecting the particular causes for his exit provides important context for understanding the station’s subsequent programming selections. For instance, if Max’s departure stemmed from disagreements concerning programming route, subsequent modifications in present format and content material develop into extra comprehensible.
The sensible significance of understanding Max’s departure lies in its affect on WHO Radio’s reference to its viewers. Lengthy-time listeners developed a robust relationship with the acquainted voices of Max and, beforehand, Amy. Their departures inevitably disrupt this connection, requiring the station to rebuild belief and engagement with its viewers. This course of typically entails introducing new personalities, adjusting program codecs, and actively participating with listener suggestions. The success of this transition interval immediately impacts the station’s long-term viability and its continued relevance inside the native media panorama. Analyzing listener response to those modifications, whether or not via rankings knowledge or social media engagement, provides essential insights into the effectiveness of the station’s methods.
3. Lengthy-running morning present
The “Max and Amy” present’s longevity on WHO Radio is central to understanding the affect of their eventual departures. A protracted-running program cultivates a devoted listener base, establishes a well-recognized routine for its viewers, and turns into deeply intertwined with the station’s id. Exploring the particular traits of this long-running present supplies essential context for analyzing the implications of its ending and the challenges confronted by WHO Radio in adapting to a brand new programming panorama.
-
Neighborhood Connection
Lengthy-running reveals typically foster a robust sense of neighborhood amongst listeners. Common call-in segments, native information protection, and neighborhood occasion promotions contribute to this connection. The “Max and Amy” present doubtless performed a major position in connecting WHO Radio with its native viewers, making their departures extra disruptive and necessitating cautious consideration of easy methods to preserve that reference to new programming.
-
Established Habits and Listener Loyalty
Morning routines typically revolve round particular media consumption habits. Listeners tune in to acquainted voices and established program codecs as a part of their each day routine. The lengthy tenure of “Max and Amy” doubtless solidified this behavior amongst a section of WHO Radio’s viewers, making it essential for the station to supply compelling options that cater to those ingrained listening patterns.
-
Affect on Station Identification
Well-liked, long-running reveals typically develop into synonymous with the station itself. “Max and Amy” doubtless contributed considerably to WHO Radio’s picture and model recognition inside the native market. Their departures offered a problem in sustaining this established id whereas concurrently evolving to draw new listeners and adapt to altering media consumption tendencies.
-
Transitioning to New Programming
Changing a long-running present presents a fancy set of challenges. Balancing the necessity to retain present listeners whereas attracting new audiences requires cautious programming selections. WHO Radio’s technique within the wake of Max’s departure is crucial to analyzing its long-term success in adapting to the altering media panorama. This would possibly contain introducing new personalities, altering program codecs, or shifting the station’s general focus.
The long-running nature of the “Max and Amy” present magnifies the affect of their departures. Understanding the present’s position in shaping listener habits, fostering neighborhood connections, and establishing the station’s id is vital for analyzing WHO Radio’s subsequent programming selections and their effectiveness in navigating the evolving media panorama. The present’s longevity underscores the significance of contemplating listener loyalty and established routines when implementing programming modifications.
4. Native information and interviews
The deal with native information and interviews served as a cornerstone of the “Max and Amy” present on WHO Radio and performed a major position in its reference to the Des Moines neighborhood. This emphasis doubtless contributed to the present’s long-term recognition and formed listener expectations. Inspecting the interaction between native information protection, neighborhood engagement via interviews, and the eventual departures of Max and Amy supplies worthwhile insights into the present’s affect and the next challenges confronted by the station. This system doubtless supplied a platform for native politicians, neighborhood leaders, and residents to debate essential points, fostering a way of civic engagement and contributing to the station’s position as a neighborhood data hub. This focus doubtless distinguished the “Max and Amy” present from syndicated or nationally targeted packages, solidifying its distinctive place inside the market.
The departure of each personalities offered a problem in sustaining this established native focus. Listeners accustomed to the present’s particular method to native information and interviews could have developed expectations concerning the model, tone, and depth of protection. WHO Radio doubtless needed to rigorously take into account easy methods to preserve this important component of its programming whereas adapting to the absence of acquainted voices. For instance, the station might need chosen to take care of the emphasis on native content material by that includes new hosts with sturdy neighborhood ties or by implementing particular segments devoted to native information and interviews. Alternatively, the station might need shifted its focus, doubtlessly incorporating extra syndicated content material or adopting a distinct programming method altogether. Analyzing these programming selections reveals the station’s priorities and its technique for navigating the altering media panorama.
Understanding the position of native information and interviews inside the context of the “Max and Amy” present on WHO Radio is essential for evaluating the broader affect of their departures. This focus doubtless contributed considerably to the present’s recognition and the station’s reference to the Des Moines neighborhood. Inspecting how WHO Radio tailored its programming after their exits reveals the station’s methods for sustaining listener engagement and navigating the evolving calls for of the native media market. The emphasis on native content material doubtless created a novel reference to the viewers, presenting each a problem and a chance for the station within the wake of serious on-air persona modifications.
5. Neighborhood engagement focus
The “Max and Amy” present’s emphasis on neighborhood engagement performed a significant position in its success and considerably influenced the affect of their departures from WHO Radio. This focus fostered a robust connection between the station and its listeners, establishing the present as a platform for native voices and a supply of knowledge related to the Des Moines neighborhood. Understanding this connection is essential for analyzing the next programming selections made by WHO Radio and their effectiveness in sustaining viewers engagement.
This neighborhood engagement manifested in a number of methods. Common interviews with native figures, protection of neighborhood occasions, and on-air discussions of native points supplied listeners with a way of connection and possession. The present doubtless served as a conduit between neighborhood members and native leaders, facilitating dialogue and contributing to civic engagement. Examples would possibly embrace interviews with native politicians throughout election cycles, discussions with neighborhood organizers about native initiatives, or protection of college board conferences and native festivals. This direct engagement with the neighborhood distinguished the “Max and Amy” present from different packages and sure contributed considerably to its loyal listener base.
Their departures offered WHO Radio with a major problem: easy methods to preserve this established sense of neighborhood engagement with out the acquainted personalities who had cultivated it for years. The station confronted the duty of discovering new methods to attach with its viewers and reveal its continued dedication to native points. This might need concerned incorporating new community-focused segments, that includes new hosts with established native ties, or rising its protection of neighborhood occasions. The success of those efforts immediately impacted the station’s means to retain its present listener base and preserve its place inside the native media panorama. The lack of established neighborhood connections represents a tangible consequence of the on-air persona modifications and underscores the significance of neighborhood engagement as a key part of profitable native radio programming.
6. Particular person Profession Paths
Inspecting the person profession paths of Max and Amy after their departures from WHO Radio supplies important context for understanding the broader narrative of “what occurred to Max and Amy on WHO Radio.” Their subsequent profession selections supply insights into their motivations for leaving, their skilled targets, and the general evolution of the media panorama. These particular person trajectories make clear the dynamics of on-air expertise selections and contribute to a complete understanding of the modifications at WHO Radio.
-
Max’s Put up-WHO Profession
Understanding Max’s profession trajectory after leaving WHO Radio supplies worthwhile perspective. Did he pursue alternatives in different media markets? Did he transition to a distinct position inside the media trade, corresponding to administration or manufacturing? Or did he pursue a profession outdoors of broadcasting altogether? Every chance provides completely different insights into his motivations for leaving and the elements influencing on-air expertise selections. For instance, a transfer to a bigger market would possibly recommend ambition for profession development, whereas a shift to a distinct trade might point out altering private or skilled priorities.
-
Amy’s Put up-WHO Profession
Equally, exploring Amy’s profession path after her earlier departure in 2007 supplies essential context for understanding the general story. Her subsequent selections could have influenced Max’s eventual resolution and supply insights into the broader tendencies affecting on-air expertise within the native media market. Did she stay in broadcasting, or did she pursue different alternatives? Her trajectory supplies a worthwhile level of comparability and contributes to a extra complete understanding of the dynamics at play.
-
Affect of Media Panorama Modifications
The person profession paths of Max and Amy may illuminate broader modifications within the media panorama. The rise of digital media, the altering consumption habits of audiences, and the rising consolidation of media possession all affect profession selections inside the trade. Inspecting their selections within the context of those broader tendencies supplies insights into the challenges and alternatives confronted by on-air expertise within the evolving media atmosphere. For example, if each pursued digital media ventures, it would recommend an adaptation to altering viewers preferences.
-
Affect on WHO Radio’s Programming Technique
Lastly, understanding their particular person profession paths can inform an evaluation of WHO Radio’s subsequent programming technique. The station’s selections concerning new hires, format modifications, and general programming route are doubtless influenced by the departures of established personalities and the broader tendencies inside the media trade. Inspecting how WHO Radio tailored to the lack of its long-time morning present hosts reveals its methods for sustaining viewers engagement and navigating the challenges of the evolving media panorama.
By analyzing the person profession paths of Max and Amy, a extra nuanced understanding of their time at WHO Radio and the circumstances surrounding their departures emerges. These particular person trajectories supply worthwhile insights into the broader forces shaping the media trade and the challenges confronted by native radio stations in sustaining their reference to their communities. Their post-WHO careers illuminate the bigger narrative of change inside each the native media market and the broadcasting trade as an entire.
7. WHO Radio Programming Modifications
WHO Radio programming modifications are inextricably linked to the departures of Max and Amy. Their long-running morning present considerably formed the station’s id and listener habits. Due to this fact, understanding the programming changes made within the wake of their exits is essential for analyzing the station’s response to those departures and its broader programming technique.
-
Format Changes
Format changes signify a direct consequence of on-air persona modifications. Changing a long-standing duo like Max and Amy typically necessitates shifts in program construction, content material, and on-air dynamic. Examples embrace transitioning from a conversational, interview-driven format to a extra music-focused method or incorporating completely different segments like visitors and climate updates. These changes replicate the station’s efforts to adapt to the lack of acquainted voices and cater to doubtlessly evolving listener preferences.
-
New Personalities and Present Ideas
Introducing new personalities is a key part of programming modifications following the departure of established hosts. The collection of new expertise typically displays the station’s audience and desired programming route. For example, hiring youthful hosts would possibly sign an try to draw a youthful demographic, whereas deciding on personalities with sturdy native ties might point out a continued dedication to neighborhood engagement. New present ideas, developed round these new personalities, additional form the station’s evolving id.
-
Shift in Goal Viewers
Programming modifications can replicate a acutely aware effort to shift the station’s audience. Following the departure of long-time hosts, a station would possibly select to revamp its programming to attraction to a distinct demographic. This might contain modifications in music choice, program format, or the subjects addressed on-air. Analyzing these shifts supplies insights into the station’s general market technique and its response to evolving listener demographics and media consumption tendencies.
-
Content material and Focus Modifications
Modifications in programming content material signify one other vital side of the station’s response to on-air persona departures. A station would possibly select to change its focus, doubtlessly shifting from a primarily native information and interview format to a extra entertainment-focused method. These modifications can affect listener engagement and necessitate an evaluation of listener suggestions and rankings knowledge to evaluate the effectiveness of the brand new programming technique. For instance, a shift in the direction of syndicated content material would possibly cut back manufacturing prices however might additionally alienate listeners who valued the earlier emphasis on native points.
By analyzing these programming modifications at WHO Radio, one positive factors a clearer understanding of the station’s strategic response to the departures of Max and Amy. These changes replicate the station’s efforts to take care of listener engagement, adapt to evolving viewers preferences, and navigate the altering dynamics of the native media panorama. The programming selections made within the wake of those departures finally form the station’s id and its future trajectory inside the market.
8. Affect on native media panorama
The departures of Max and Amy from WHO Radio signify a major occasion inside the Des Moines media panorama. Their long-tenured morning present cultivated a loyal listener base and established the station as a key supply of native information, interviews, and neighborhood engagement. Consequently, their exits created a ripple impact, impacting not solely WHO Radio but additionally the broader aggressive dynamics of the native media market. This affect necessitates an examination of the ensuing shifts in listener preferences, aggressive responses from different stations, and the evolving position of native media locally.
The speedy affect centered on viewers fragmentation. Listeners accustomed to the “Max and Amy” present doubtless sought various sources for his or her morning information and leisure. This offered each a problem and a chance for competing stations. Some stations might need tried to seize this displaced viewers by adjusting their programming to cater to comparable preferences. Others might need maintained their present methods, anticipating that the fragmented viewers would finally redistribute throughout the market. Analyzing listener conduct throughout this era, via rankings knowledge and market analysis, provides worthwhile insights into viewers loyalty, media consumption habits, and the effectiveness of competing stations’ methods. For instance, a sudden improve in listenership for a competing morning present suggests a direct correlation with the “Max and Amy” departure, highlighting the aggressive dynamics inside the market. This ripple impact doubtlessly prolonged past radio, impacting native tv stations, newspapers, and on-line information platforms vying for viewers consideration.
Lengthy-term penalties embrace a possible shift within the steadiness of energy inside the native media panorama. WHO Radio’s dominance within the morning drive-time slot might need diminished, permitting competing stations to realize market share. This shift can affect promoting revenues, programming selections, and the general panorama of native information and knowledge dissemination. Moreover, the departures underscore the evolving relationship between on-air personalities, station id, and viewers loyalty within the digital age. The rising accessibility of numerous media sources, from podcasts to streaming providers, challenges the normal dominance of native radio and necessitates adaptation from native media retailers. The “Max and Amy” scenario serves as a case examine for understanding these broader tendencies and their affect on native communities’ entry to information and knowledge. The shifts in listener conduct, aggressive responses, and the long-term penalties on market share spotlight the numerous position of on-air personalities in shaping the native media panorama and the challenges confronted by stations in adapting to vary.
9. Station’s evolving viewers
WHO Radio’s evolving viewers is intrinsically linked to the departures of Max and Amy. Their long-running morning present cultivated a particular listener demographic, accustomed to their model, content material, and neighborhood focus. Their exits inevitably prompted shifts in listenership, creating each challenges and alternatives for the station. Understanding these viewers dynamics is essential for analyzing the long-term penalties of those departures and the station’s subsequent programming selections.
-
Altering Demographics
Radio audiences, like several inhabitants group, expertise demographic shifts over time. Growing older listeners could change their media consumption habits, whereas youthful demographics would possibly favor completely different platforms or content material codecs. The departure of established personalities can speed up these shifts, as long-time listeners could determine to discover various choices. For instance, youthful listeners much less conversant in Max and Amy is likely to be extra receptive to new programming codecs and personalities, presenting a chance for WHO Radio to draw a brand new demographic.
-
Media Consumption Habits
The rise of digital media and streaming providers has profoundly impacted media consumption habits. Audiences more and more entry information and leisure via podcasts, on-line radio, and on-demand platforms. The departures of acquainted radio personalities can affect listener selections to discover these various choices. For instance, long-time listeners would possibly transition to podcasts specializing in comparable subjects or that includes personalities with comparable types to Max and Amy.
-
Affect of Format Modifications
WHO Radio’s programming changes after Max and Amy’s departures doubtless impacted its viewers. Modifications in music choice, program format, or content material focus can appeal to new listeners whereas doubtlessly alienating present ones. For example, a shift in the direction of a extra music-heavy format would possibly appeal to a youthful viewers however dissuade listeners who valued the earlier emphasis on native information and interviews. Analyzing listener suggestions and rankings knowledge can reveal the effectiveness of those format modifications in attracting and retaining completely different segments of the viewers.
-
Competitors and Viewers Fragmentation
The departures of in style radio personalities can result in viewers fragmentation inside the native media market. Listeners could migrate to competing stations or discover various media platforms, creating alternatives for rival stations to realize market share. WHO Radio’s means to retain its viewers share is determined by its programming technique and its effectiveness in attracting new listeners. The success of competing stations in capturing this fragmented viewers supplies insights into the aggressive dynamics of the native media panorama.
The evolving viewers at WHO Radio represents a major issue within the aftermath of Max and Amy’s departures. Understanding the interaction between altering demographics, shifting media consumption habits, programming changes, and aggressive pressures supplies a complete perspective on the station’s challenges and alternatives. By analyzing these viewers dynamics, one positive factors a deeper understanding of the long-term affect of those departures on WHO Radio’s place inside the native media panorama and its methods for adapting to an evolving media atmosphere.
Often Requested Questions on Max and Amy’s Departure from WHO Radio
This part addresses widespread inquiries concerning the departures of Max and Amy from WHO Radio, offering readability and context surrounding these vital occasions within the station’s historical past.
Query 1: When did Max and Amy go away WHO Radio?
Amy departed in 2007, whereas Max continued till 2021.
Query 2: Why did Amy go away WHO Radio?
Particular causes for Amy’s departure weren’t publicly disclosed. Potential elements embrace profession development, contract negotiations, or private selections.
Query 3: Why did Max go away WHO Radio?
Just like Amy’s departure, particular particulars concerning Max’s exit weren’t publicly launched. Potentialities embrace retirement, new profession alternatives, or modifications in station administration and programming route.
Query 4: What occurred to the morning present after Amy left?
Max continued to host the morning present solo after Amy’s departure, sustaining the same format however with changes to accommodate a single host.
Query 5: What changed the “Max and Amy” present?
Following Max’s departure, WHO Radio carried out new programming for the morning slot, doubtless involving new personalities and doubtlessly a revised format. Particular particulars concerning the alternative present may be discovered via the station’s official assets.
Query 6: How did these departures affect WHO Radio?
The departures of Max and Amy represented a major shift for WHO Radio. The station needed to adapt its programming, rebuild listener connections, and navigate the aggressive panorama of the native media market. The long-term affect on the station’s viewers and its place inside the market requires additional evaluation and statement.
Understanding the circumstances surrounding these departures supplies worthwhile context for analyzing the evolution of WHO Radio and the broader dynamics of the native media panorama. Additional analysis into particular person profession paths, station programming modifications, and viewers responses can supply a extra complete understanding of those vital occasions.
This concludes the FAQ part. The next sections will additional discover particular elements of this subject in higher element.
Suggestions for Understanding On-Air Expertise Modifications in Native Media
Modifications in on-air personalities, such because the departures of Max and Amy from WHO Radio, typically signify vital shifts in native media landscapes. Understanding the underlying dynamics and potential penalties of those modifications can present worthwhile insights for each listeners and media professionals. The next ideas supply steerage for navigating these transitions and deciphering their broader implications.
Tip 1: Analysis the Historic Context
Investigating the historical past of this system and the personalities concerned supplies essential background. Understanding the present’s format, audience, and neighborhood engagement efforts establishes a baseline for assessing the affect of personnel modifications.
Tip 2: Monitor Station Programming Changes
Pay shut consideration to format modifications, new personalities, and shifts in content material focus. These changes replicate the station’s strategic response to on-air expertise departures and its efforts to retain or appeal to listeners. Observe how these modifications align with the station’s general programming technique.
Tip 3: Analyze Listener Suggestions and Rankings Knowledge
Listener suggestions, via social media, call-in segments, or official surveys, provides worthwhile insights into viewers reactions to on-air expertise modifications. Rankings knowledge supplies quantifiable measures of viewers engagement and may reveal the affect of programming changes on listenership.
Tip 4: Take into account the Broader Media Panorama
On-air expertise modifications typically replicate broader tendencies inside the media trade. Take into account the affect of digital media, altering viewers preferences, and aggressive pressures on station programming selections. These exterior elements play a major position in shaping native media landscapes.
Tip 5: Comply with Particular person Profession Paths
Monitoring the next profession trajectories of departed personalities provides further context. New roles in different markets, transitions to completely different media sectors, or departures from the trade altogether present insights into particular person motivations and the broader forces impacting on-air expertise selections.
Tip 6: Consider Neighborhood Affect
Assess the affect of on-air expertise modifications on neighborhood engagement and native information protection. Modifications in programming can have an effect on the station’s means to function a platform for native voices and deal with neighborhood issues. Take into account the implications for native data dissemination and civic engagement.
By using the following tips, one positive factors a extra complete understanding of the complexities surrounding on-air expertise modifications in native media. These insights enable for a extra knowledgeable interpretation of those transitions and their broader affect on the media panorama.
This exploration of ideas for understanding on-air expertise modifications transitions into the concluding part of this text, which is able to summarize the important thing takeaways and supply remaining reflections on the departures of Max and Amy from WHO Radio.
Conclusion
This exploration examined the circumstances surrounding the departures of Max and Amy from WHO Radio, delving into the person departures, the station’s programming changes, and the broader affect on the native media panorama. Amy’s 2007 exit marked an preliminary shift, whereas Max’s 2021 departure signified the definitive finish of an period. The long-running nature of their morning present, its deal with native information and neighborhood engagement, and its established listener base magnified the affect of those modifications. WHO Radio’s subsequent programming selections, together with format changes and the introduction of latest personalities, replicate its strategic response to those departures and its efforts to navigate the evolving media panorama. Analyzing particular person profession paths supplied further context, illuminating broader tendencies inside the media trade.
The departures of Max and Amy function a case examine within the evolving dynamics of native media. Understanding the interaction between on-air personalities, station id, listener loyalty, and aggressive pressures is essential for navigating the altering media panorama. Additional investigation into viewers fragmentation, shifting media consumption habits, and the long-term penalties of those departures will supply continued insights into the evolving relationship between native radio and its neighborhood. The transformation of WHO Radio’s programming underscores the continuing adaptation required of native media retailers within the digital age and the enduring affect of established voices on the native media panorama.
